Mr. Reindeer
White Lodge
- Apr 13, 2022
- 924
- 2,014
In the Conversations book, Frost talks a few times about how he doesn’t like to repeat himself. The Six Messiahs bears this out. While a sequel to The List of Seven and, yes, another supernatural occult thriller starring Arthur Conan Doyle, the book is very different in terms of structure and tone, and takes its characters—particularly Jack Sparks—in some unpredictable (and dark) directions. While not as radical a shift as The Return is from the original Twin Peaks, there is some of the same feel in terms of expanding and redefining an existing world, refusing to present a “comfort food” retread for fans of the first book. Some reader reviews I’ve seen online could easily fit into the Profoundly Disappointed thread on dugpa when The Return aired: “I just wanted to see Arthur Conan Doyle and Jack Sparks solving a mystery and having adventures together. This is not that.” It’s interesting to see those impulses in Frost as far back as 1995, refusing to settle or play it safe in a sequel to a well-received work. One thing The Six Messiahs has in common with The Return is the expansiveness of its story. If not a stronger novel than The List of Seven (which I would argue it is), it is at the very least undeniably a more confident work. Whereas The List of Seven is a very linear work, following one character and his allies on a relatively straightforward adventure, The Six Messiahs seems to be taking its inspiration from Stephen King’s The Stand moreso than Arthur Conan Doyle (Frost has notably called The Stand the best King novel, and of course any rational reader would agree—and he also included the novel on the Bookhouse Boys’ bookshelf in The Secret History of Twin Peaks). We follow not only Doyle (whose exploits only cover roughly half the novel, I would estimate…perhaps a bit more), but a large cast of disparate characters from all walks of life and all over America, who have no link to one another except that some of them share a strange dream that slowly brings them together (these are the titular “Six Messiahs”), and others are collateral who in the course of pursuing their own agendas get swept along in the wakes of the Six. The shared dream even prominently involves a “dark tower” which plays a key role in the book (although Frost has said that he is not particularly a fan of that King series, the reference/inspiration seems almost undeniably intentional), and Jack’s brother, the evil Alexander Sparks, is in full-on Randall Flagg mode here.
We meet back up with Doyle in September 1894, nearly a full ten years after The List of Seven took place. Now a wildly successful author and a family man with two kids, he is embarking on his first trip to America, for an ambitious press tour (as the real Doyle in fact did this year). The problem is that he killed off his famed literary creation Sherlock Holmes the prior year (in circumstances mirroring the supposed deaths of Jack and Alexander Sparks in The List of Seven), having grown tired of writing him, but all anyone wants him to talk about is Sherlock Holmes! In a page taken from the actual Doyle’s life, but also pretty clearly once again Frost using Doyle as a convenient self-insert, Doyle has become deeply resentful of his Holmes fame, and just wants people to pay attention to his historical novels, which he feels have much higher literary value. The old Usenet Twin Peaks FAQ claims that this is Frost cheekily venting about his promotional tour for The List of Seven, where all people wanted to talk about was Twin Peaks, and one does not have to squint too much to see the parallel. Frost portrays Doyle’s wife (Louisa, again strangely renamed “Louise” by Frost) as ill; in reality, Louisa died in 1906 after a prolonged battle with tuberculosis, although I’m not sure if she was sick as far back as 1894. Doyle rather callously decides that, since he can do nothing to help her, and his constantly concerned presence is more of a stressor to her than a comfort, he may as well take off to America for five months. As in reality, Doyle is accompanied to America by his twenty-one-year-old brother, Innes, whose three defining characteristics in Frost’s book are his bravery and resilience due to his time in the Royal Fusiliers, his mental sluggishness, and his permanent horndog state. (I don’t know if the real Innes was this thirsty all the time, but I guess when you’re writing a twenty-one-year-old, it’s not an unreasonable supposition.)
Unsurprisingly, Jack Sparks—the Holmes surrogate and breakout character from the first book—is revealed to be alive. Rather more surprisingly, he is an utterly broken man, who found himself rendered as a clean slate after his tumble from Reichenbach Falls, void of purpose and meaning with his brother seemingly dead. After experimenting with a variety of life experiences, Sparks ultimately embraced a nihilistic worldview that has led him to commit coldblooded murder and to fall into a three-year stint in an opium den. Jack’s accounting of his past decade’s experiences to Doyle is the centerpiece of the book, and while it is maybe not quite as effective as Frost intends it to be (it can come across as a bit emo, perhaps partially by design as Frost clearly doesn’t endorse Sparks’s full-on rejection of societal norms even as he also clearly sees the value in the questioning of them), it does read as true to the character’s experiences given his bizarre and emotionally difficult life, and also feels genuine to a psychological examination of a quasi-Sherlock Holmes character. One of the more intriguing ideas Sparks explores during his years off the grid is the concept of a transferable universal consciousness, free from individual identity (Sparks becomes an eagle during an ayahuasca trip), but he draws the wrong conclusions from this and slides into a life of amorality. In this way, you get the sense how straying outside the bounds of societal guidance—something Frost no doubt encourages—can lead you into dangerous territory if you’re not careful. When Doyle angrily admonishes Jack about the life without consequences he has seemingly embraced, Sparks sadly replies, “I never claimed there were no consequences. Consequences are all I’ve been describing.” Frost’s point seems to be that we need to question and, when appropriate, reject societal norms, but simultaneously replace them with our own personal code, as opposed to rejecting morality altogether.
I was slightly lying when I said the Six Messiahs have nothing in common beyond the shared dream. They also (almost) all have some tie to a sacred text which has recently been stolen (as we’ll eventually learn, for use in an occult ceremony at the dark tower). The Six Messiahs are:
The early chapters build to the central plot slowly, with Doyle’s trip across the Atlantic being initially filled with various storylines that don’t really lead anywhere: the obnoxious reporter Ira Pinkus who shadows Doyle throughout the journey but then completely disappears from the narrative once they reach New York, and a séance involving famed medium Sophie Hill (as far as I can tell, a fictional creation of Frost’s). The séance feels very deliberately like a callback to List, almost like Frost is repeating himself, perhaps to throw the reader into a false sense of familiarity before changing things up. Although Doyle makes a big deal about wanting to disprove Hill’s methods, it seems that her abilities are truly genuine, and she (by way of the spirit speaking through her) gives a brief tease of the main plot before she disappears entirely from the book. Interestingly enough, Doyle here says he believes the dead do not truly communicate through séances: rather, any correspondence received is comparable to a “footprint” left behind in the world by the deceased, due to an abrupt and/or spiritually confused departure. This seems to be at odds with Doyle’s experience in List, and certainly with the real Doyle’s beliefs. Doyle finally gets roped into the story proper when he meets Lionel Stern, Jacob’s son, on board, transporting the Gerona Zohar.
Frost faced a dilemma with Alexander Sparks. He was such an intriguing villain in the first book, the reader naturally wants to see him again, and any substitute would likely come up short; but allowing both Jack and Alexander to survive the fall in Switzerland could come off as cheap. The solution Frost landed on—to have both suffer grievous consequences of the fall, both physically and mentally—works much more effectively than it has any right to. Alexander has amnesia, allowing him to become an entirely different character with no memory of his past—albeit still drawn inexorably to evil. This is, from a moral/philosophical standpoint, perhaps my biggest issue with the book. Frost discusses in Conversations how he believes Alexander makes a conscious choice to be evil, and how Leland on Twin Peaks is morally responsible for his actions, etc., and yet just as with the ambiguity surrounding Leland in Episode 16, I question here whether Frost is really properly executing the idea he claims he had in mind. If Alexander is a blank slate after going over the falls, and again is naturally inclined to evil, I question whether he had any choice in the matter at all, or if it was just his nature by birth? In the duality between Jack and Alexander, we see a more intriguing exploration of this with Jack, who swings over to the amoral/immoral side before righting himself, but poor Alexander never gets to even consider being good. Even taking up the cloth and assuming the identity of Reverend A. Glorious Day (a terrific name, by the way), his intentions are never anything but the consolidation of power and the awakening of evil, the same motivations he had in List. (In the prologue to Messiahs, set five years before the main body of the novel, he realizes that if he is going to pose as a Reverend, he’ll probably have to read the Bible; he later reveals that he stole the preacher outfit off a man he killed in South Carolina.)
As in List, a major theme in the book’s philosophical digressions is mankind’s fall from grace, and even Rabbi Jacob theorizes that the Creator of this world must logically also be a “terribly wounded and incomplete being,” in exile with the rest of us and “stumbling on his own path toward spiritual perfection,” if the world was created in his image. Walks Alone articulates the Native American belief that the white man has brought about a rift with nature, and a division between mind and heart, leading to the world becoming sick. Relatedly, the questions of free will and why God would place the potential for evil in man prove key to the book’s plot, particularly when Reverend Day’s plan is revealed. Jacob views evil as a test to be overcome in order to strengthen us, to correct our brokenness. Reverend Day instead believes that the potential for evil was placed in us so that we could use it to defy God’s rules, move beyond conventional morality, and thus become godlike ourselves—the Reverend views God as “plagued by doubt,” “a parent losing control of its children as we outgrow the need for His protection.” He believes the flawed nature of our world is evidence of God’s imperfection, and that God himself planted the key to his own defeat in the holy books—albeit subconsciously, as he can’t consciously acknowledge his failure. The Messiah Day seeks to awaken is “the one angel too pure and selfless for the likes of God,” the Archangel (presumably Lucifer, although Lucifer is never specifically named as an archangel in the Bible).
We’re left to consider how his plans to birth “the Beast” fit into the mythology of List. If (as implied in the epilogue of List) Alexander has already managed to rebirth the “Dweller on the Threshold” into an infant Adolf Hitler, is the Beast he’s trying to revive here a separate entity? Both seem to be pretty definitively linked with the Judeo-Christian Satan. Is that last beat in List just a gag that we weren’t meant to take as a serious part of the plot?
One of the more interesting passages, for Peaks fans, is the scene where Walks Alone tries to “heal” Jack by removing the evil/sickness inside him. She claims that, “The soul is able to travel far but must then find its way back,” and that in Jack’s case, the soul’s place was stolen by a windigo or demon. But what makes it really interesting is the description of the ceremony, which bears more than a bit of similarity to the Woodsmen’s ritual in Part 8 of The Return:
Another dreadful scream broke Jack’s lips and his body bridged off the floor, taut as a bowstring. Realizing his cries could be heard up and down the length of the car, Doyle thought to close the compartment door, but he could not respond to the impulse when he saw something appear in her hands as she quickly raised them from Jack’s chest:
A wobbly transparent mass of pink-and-red tissues about the size of an oblong grapefruit, a hot black jellied nugget burning in its center, mottled all around with curved bands of a sickly gray substance that like ribs seemed to give the object structure.
Something fetal, a larva, more insectoid than human, thought Doyle. He turned to Innes; his face had gone white as an egg. Doyle felt strangely reassured; at least Innes was seeing it, too.
The woman’s hands continued to agitate, vibrating at such an impossibly high rate it made it impossible for them to determine whether the queasy handful was being shaken by her or animated by its own odious energy.
Eileen Temple, Doyle’s love interest from List, is given her own substantial subplot here as she falls unwittingly into Rabbi Stern’s orbit, and she comes across as a much more fully-formed character than in the prior novel. Although Messiahs doesn’t quite pass the Bechdel Test (the only woman Eileen has a conversation with is herself, and most of her internal monologues center on men, sex, and finding a steady partner), it’s a realistic portrayal for the period anyway, and her characterization is both poignant and funny. Having fled England following the events of List, a decade on, Eileen is a disillusioned aging actress touring America in a third-rate road production of The Prisoner of Zenda (with the hilariously named Penultimate Players and their equally ludicrous impresario/star, Bendigo Rymer—who tells anyone who will listen that his great Broadway career was derailed by a jealous Edwin Booth, brother of John Wilkes). Frost, who had a substantial stage background in Minnesota both during and after college (producing, directing, writing, acting), and whose parents had lived the “theater gypsy” life, had some fun with theater culture in List, through Eileen’s character and particularly in the chapter featuring Bram Stoker, but in Messiahs he really goes to town, lovingly satirizing the absurdities and overbearing personalities of the profession.
(Continued in next post due to character limit)
We meet back up with Doyle in September 1894, nearly a full ten years after The List of Seven took place. Now a wildly successful author and a family man with two kids, he is embarking on his first trip to America, for an ambitious press tour (as the real Doyle in fact did this year). The problem is that he killed off his famed literary creation Sherlock Holmes the prior year (in circumstances mirroring the supposed deaths of Jack and Alexander Sparks in The List of Seven), having grown tired of writing him, but all anyone wants him to talk about is Sherlock Holmes! In a page taken from the actual Doyle’s life, but also pretty clearly once again Frost using Doyle as a convenient self-insert, Doyle has become deeply resentful of his Holmes fame, and just wants people to pay attention to his historical novels, which he feels have much higher literary value. The old Usenet Twin Peaks FAQ claims that this is Frost cheekily venting about his promotional tour for The List of Seven, where all people wanted to talk about was Twin Peaks, and one does not have to squint too much to see the parallel. Frost portrays Doyle’s wife (Louisa, again strangely renamed “Louise” by Frost) as ill; in reality, Louisa died in 1906 after a prolonged battle with tuberculosis, although I’m not sure if she was sick as far back as 1894. Doyle rather callously decides that, since he can do nothing to help her, and his constantly concerned presence is more of a stressor to her than a comfort, he may as well take off to America for five months. As in reality, Doyle is accompanied to America by his twenty-one-year-old brother, Innes, whose three defining characteristics in Frost’s book are his bravery and resilience due to his time in the Royal Fusiliers, his mental sluggishness, and his permanent horndog state. (I don’t know if the real Innes was this thirsty all the time, but I guess when you’re writing a twenty-one-year-old, it’s not an unreasonable supposition.)
Unsurprisingly, Jack Sparks—the Holmes surrogate and breakout character from the first book—is revealed to be alive. Rather more surprisingly, he is an utterly broken man, who found himself rendered as a clean slate after his tumble from Reichenbach Falls, void of purpose and meaning with his brother seemingly dead. After experimenting with a variety of life experiences, Sparks ultimately embraced a nihilistic worldview that has led him to commit coldblooded murder and to fall into a three-year stint in an opium den. Jack’s accounting of his past decade’s experiences to Doyle is the centerpiece of the book, and while it is maybe not quite as effective as Frost intends it to be (it can come across as a bit emo, perhaps partially by design as Frost clearly doesn’t endorse Sparks’s full-on rejection of societal norms even as he also clearly sees the value in the questioning of them), it does read as true to the character’s experiences given his bizarre and emotionally difficult life, and also feels genuine to a psychological examination of a quasi-Sherlock Holmes character. One of the more intriguing ideas Sparks explores during his years off the grid is the concept of a transferable universal consciousness, free from individual identity (Sparks becomes an eagle during an ayahuasca trip), but he draws the wrong conclusions from this and slides into a life of amorality. In this way, you get the sense how straying outside the bounds of societal guidance—something Frost no doubt encourages—can lead you into dangerous territory if you’re not careful. When Doyle angrily admonishes Jack about the life without consequences he has seemingly embraced, Sparks sadly replies, “I never claimed there were no consequences. Consequences are all I’ve been describing.” Frost’s point seems to be that we need to question and, when appropriate, reject societal norms, but simultaneously replace them with our own personal code, as opposed to rejecting morality altogether.
I was slightly lying when I said the Six Messiahs have nothing in common beyond the shared dream. They also (almost) all have some tie to a sacred text which has recently been stolen (as we’ll eventually learn, for use in an occult ceremony at the dark tower). The Six Messiahs are:
- Jack Sparks: who has been charged by the Queen with locating the Latin Vulgate Bible, the oldest biblical manuscript in the Anglican Church
- Jacob Stern: a New York rabbi and expert in Kabbalah—an esoteric/mystical offshoot of Judaism—whose son is transporting to him the Gerona Zohar, the earliest complete manuscript of the Sefer ha-Zohar, or “Book of Splendor,” when Jacob becomes aware of the theft of the corresponding Tikkunei Zohar, an addendum, from a Chicago colleague. The Zohar, a real esoteric text and the foundation for Kabbalah, allegedly contains the key to “unlocking” the Torah and revealing the mystery of creation and the identity of the creator (Jacob presents a rather tantalizing analogy to the way a telephone works: words are translated into electrical signals which turn back into words on the other end, just as the shapes and sounds of the words in scripture are an imperfect vessel for delivering God’s words, which can be theoretically deciphered back to their purest form)
- Kanazuchi (“the Hammer”): a Japanese warrior who doesn’t hesitate to murder a man just to use his uniform as a disguise, but makes sure to pray afterward to thank him for his gift and to wish him a reward in the afterlife. An orphan raised in a Shinto monastery, he is charged with finding the stolen Kojiki, the oldest literary work in Japan and foundational text of the ancient Shinto religion
- Preston “Presto” Peregrine Raipur: an English barrister, and also the Maharaja of Berar (a purely ceremonial title, as he admits, since his grandfather ceded the territory to the Nizam of Hyderabad, who promptly transferred control to the British; although this is more or less historically accurate, Presto himself appears to be a fictional character). Tapped (more accurately, coerced) by his childhood friend, the current Nizam of Hyderabad, to recover a rare manuscript of the Upanishads, he is posing as a magician while in America (hence, “Presto”)
- Walks Alone (a.k.a. Mary Williams): a Dakota medicine woman, who shares the dream but does not have a link to any sacred text since her people do not have a written language
The early chapters build to the central plot slowly, with Doyle’s trip across the Atlantic being initially filled with various storylines that don’t really lead anywhere: the obnoxious reporter Ira Pinkus who shadows Doyle throughout the journey but then completely disappears from the narrative once they reach New York, and a séance involving famed medium Sophie Hill (as far as I can tell, a fictional creation of Frost’s). The séance feels very deliberately like a callback to List, almost like Frost is repeating himself, perhaps to throw the reader into a false sense of familiarity before changing things up. Although Doyle makes a big deal about wanting to disprove Hill’s methods, it seems that her abilities are truly genuine, and she (by way of the spirit speaking through her) gives a brief tease of the main plot before she disappears entirely from the book. Interestingly enough, Doyle here says he believes the dead do not truly communicate through séances: rather, any correspondence received is comparable to a “footprint” left behind in the world by the deceased, due to an abrupt and/or spiritually confused departure. This seems to be at odds with Doyle’s experience in List, and certainly with the real Doyle’s beliefs. Doyle finally gets roped into the story proper when he meets Lionel Stern, Jacob’s son, on board, transporting the Gerona Zohar.
Frost faced a dilemma with Alexander Sparks. He was such an intriguing villain in the first book, the reader naturally wants to see him again, and any substitute would likely come up short; but allowing both Jack and Alexander to survive the fall in Switzerland could come off as cheap. The solution Frost landed on—to have both suffer grievous consequences of the fall, both physically and mentally—works much more effectively than it has any right to. Alexander has amnesia, allowing him to become an entirely different character with no memory of his past—albeit still drawn inexorably to evil. This is, from a moral/philosophical standpoint, perhaps my biggest issue with the book. Frost discusses in Conversations how he believes Alexander makes a conscious choice to be evil, and how Leland on Twin Peaks is morally responsible for his actions, etc., and yet just as with the ambiguity surrounding Leland in Episode 16, I question here whether Frost is really properly executing the idea he claims he had in mind. If Alexander is a blank slate after going over the falls, and again is naturally inclined to evil, I question whether he had any choice in the matter at all, or if it was just his nature by birth? In the duality between Jack and Alexander, we see a more intriguing exploration of this with Jack, who swings over to the amoral/immoral side before righting himself, but poor Alexander never gets to even consider being good. Even taking up the cloth and assuming the identity of Reverend A. Glorious Day (a terrific name, by the way), his intentions are never anything but the consolidation of power and the awakening of evil, the same motivations he had in List. (In the prologue to Messiahs, set five years before the main body of the novel, he realizes that if he is going to pose as a Reverend, he’ll probably have to read the Bible; he later reveals that he stole the preacher outfit off a man he killed in South Carolina.)
As in List, a major theme in the book’s philosophical digressions is mankind’s fall from grace, and even Rabbi Jacob theorizes that the Creator of this world must logically also be a “terribly wounded and incomplete being,” in exile with the rest of us and “stumbling on his own path toward spiritual perfection,” if the world was created in his image. Walks Alone articulates the Native American belief that the white man has brought about a rift with nature, and a division between mind and heart, leading to the world becoming sick. Relatedly, the questions of free will and why God would place the potential for evil in man prove key to the book’s plot, particularly when Reverend Day’s plan is revealed. Jacob views evil as a test to be overcome in order to strengthen us, to correct our brokenness. Reverend Day instead believes that the potential for evil was placed in us so that we could use it to defy God’s rules, move beyond conventional morality, and thus become godlike ourselves—the Reverend views God as “plagued by doubt,” “a parent losing control of its children as we outgrow the need for His protection.” He believes the flawed nature of our world is evidence of God’s imperfection, and that God himself planted the key to his own defeat in the holy books—albeit subconsciously, as he can’t consciously acknowledge his failure. The Messiah Day seeks to awaken is “the one angel too pure and selfless for the likes of God,” the Archangel (presumably Lucifer, although Lucifer is never specifically named as an archangel in the Bible).
We’re left to consider how his plans to birth “the Beast” fit into the mythology of List. If (as implied in the epilogue of List) Alexander has already managed to rebirth the “Dweller on the Threshold” into an infant Adolf Hitler, is the Beast he’s trying to revive here a separate entity? Both seem to be pretty definitively linked with the Judeo-Christian Satan. Is that last beat in List just a gag that we weren’t meant to take as a serious part of the plot?
One of the more interesting passages, for Peaks fans, is the scene where Walks Alone tries to “heal” Jack by removing the evil/sickness inside him. She claims that, “The soul is able to travel far but must then find its way back,” and that in Jack’s case, the soul’s place was stolen by a windigo or demon. But what makes it really interesting is the description of the ceremony, which bears more than a bit of similarity to the Woodsmen’s ritual in Part 8 of The Return:
Another dreadful scream broke Jack’s lips and his body bridged off the floor, taut as a bowstring. Realizing his cries could be heard up and down the length of the car, Doyle thought to close the compartment door, but he could not respond to the impulse when he saw something appear in her hands as she quickly raised them from Jack’s chest:
A wobbly transparent mass of pink-and-red tissues about the size of an oblong grapefruit, a hot black jellied nugget burning in its center, mottled all around with curved bands of a sickly gray substance that like ribs seemed to give the object structure.
Something fetal, a larva, more insectoid than human, thought Doyle. He turned to Innes; his face had gone white as an egg. Doyle felt strangely reassured; at least Innes was seeing it, too.
The woman’s hands continued to agitate, vibrating at such an impossibly high rate it made it impossible for them to determine whether the queasy handful was being shaken by her or animated by its own odious energy.
Eileen Temple, Doyle’s love interest from List, is given her own substantial subplot here as she falls unwittingly into Rabbi Stern’s orbit, and she comes across as a much more fully-formed character than in the prior novel. Although Messiahs doesn’t quite pass the Bechdel Test (the only woman Eileen has a conversation with is herself, and most of her internal monologues center on men, sex, and finding a steady partner), it’s a realistic portrayal for the period anyway, and her characterization is both poignant and funny. Having fled England following the events of List, a decade on, Eileen is a disillusioned aging actress touring America in a third-rate road production of The Prisoner of Zenda (with the hilariously named Penultimate Players and their equally ludicrous impresario/star, Bendigo Rymer—who tells anyone who will listen that his great Broadway career was derailed by a jealous Edwin Booth, brother of John Wilkes). Frost, who had a substantial stage background in Minnesota both during and after college (producing, directing, writing, acting), and whose parents had lived the “theater gypsy” life, had some fun with theater culture in List, through Eileen’s character and particularly in the chapter featuring Bram Stoker, but in Messiahs he really goes to town, lovingly satirizing the absurdities and overbearing personalities of the profession.
(Continued in next post due to character limit)
Last edited: